Too Big To Fail: The Hazards of Bank Bailouts
نویسنده
چکیده
Moral hazard is one of the most basic concepts in economics: If someone pays you for your accidents, you will expend less effort trying to avoid them. Insurance companies understand this perfectly well. That's why most insurance contracts include customer deductibles and limited coverage. This seems straightforward enough. Why is it, then, that policymakers appear to have missed this important lesson? In Too Big To Fail, Bank of Minneapolis Fed President Gary Stern and Vice President Ron Feldman examine this question in the context of government policy towards bank failures. Written for policymakers, this short book lucidly explains the moral hazard problem that plagues large financial institutions policymakers deem " too big to fail " (TBTF). Why might some banks receive this privileged status? If a bank has many customers or plays a large role in the nation's financial system—for instance, by processing many of the nation's payments or security transactions—its failure may threaten the solvency of other institutions financially connected to it and to each other. By creating a domino effect, the failure of a TBTF bank threatens to cripple the national economy. For instance, if a major bank fails, and other banks rely upon this bank and its creditors to fulfill their obligations to function, then these banks too, and potentially those institutions they are financially connected to, may collapse as well. If the spillover effects generated via this process are large enough, the failure of a big bank could trigger an economy-wide recession.
منابع مشابه
The Effects of Too-Big-to-fail Banks on Depositors' Behavior
In the wake of recent financial crisis, large banks have been considered as important factors in financial markets in the world, since these bankschr(chr('39')39chr('39')) failure could affect the whole economy by extending systemic risk. With regard to this issue, when large banks face insolvency or bankruptcy, larger part of economy would be affected, and with the interconnectedness between b...
متن کاملSize and soft budget constraints
There is much evidence against the so-called ”too big to fail” hypothesis in the case of bailouts to sub-national governments. We look at a model where districts of different size provide local public goods with positive spillovers. Matching grants of a central government can induce socially-efficient provision, but districts can still exploit the intervening central government by inducing dire...
متن کاملEffects of Bank Mergers on Risk Leading Up to the 2007-2008 Mortgage Crisis
Recent highly-publicized bank mergers following the home mortgage crisis of 2007-2008, often the result of bank failure or insolvency, brought attention to the issue of consolidation within the banking industry. The banking system has seen increases in consolidation at national levels, with the largest banks gaining increasingly greater proportions of market share. This merger activity and the ...
متن کاملNber Working Paper Series How Big a Problem Is Too Big to Fail?
This review essay examines whether too-big-to-fail is as serious a problem as Gary Stern and Ron Feldman contend. This essay argues that Stern and Feldman overstate the importance of the too-bigto-fail problem and do not give enough credit to the FDICIA legislation of 1991 for improving bank regulation and supervision. However, this criticism of the Stern and Feldman book does not detract from ...
متن کاملCardiff Economics Working Papers Cardiff Business School Working Paper Series Too-big-to-fail: Bank Failure and Banking Policy in Jamaica
Research on the causes of bank failure has focused on developed countries, particularly the United States of America. Relatively little empirical work has examined developing countries. We examine the total population of banks in Jamaica between 1992 and 1998 and find that real GDP growth, size, and managerial efficiency were the most significant factors contributing to the failure of banks. Ba...
متن کامل